Upward Bound Launch Loop Video

2017 June 1, by Isaac Arthur and Colleagues


First, though I wasn't contacted by I.A. beforehand, I'm happy with the video. Thank you to the team.

The video isn't perfect; there are minor errors and invalid additions, but it is well prepared and a very good starting explanation for a lay audience. The launch loop evolves as new technologies develop and new ideas emerge; real costs will drop, though the cost in inflated dollars will rise.


If you want to help, contact me. Don't call; my hearing sucks. I want you to put in the effort to find a valid email address, that filters out the worst time-wasters.

Help is defined as you working on an important problem and producing results. I have very limited time, I can't help you with your problems. Skills needed:

I prefer to work via email and website and papers, in English.

In particular, right now I could use help with OpenACC or CUDA programming for numerical calculations on nVidia math coprocessors. There are some big calculations to do. I use Linux (particularly, Fermilab's "Scientific Linux" clone of Red Hat Enterprise Linux ).

I am particularly inclined to work with young engineers from India and China, because these ancient-yet-young cultures are where 80% of the next generation's brightest new inventors will come from. I don't exclude US/EU and others, but most young people from the rich West don't work very hard and don't take care of themselves. I would rather invest my time in ambitious and hard-working young people who will immediately multiply it, however humble or exotic their beginnings.

No, I can't help you find a graduate school or a job or a green card. See the definition of "help" above. If you are not clever enough to help yourself and others, you are not clever enough to help with launchloop.


Quibbles:

The video mentions superconductors. Not a good idea. Superconductors can make high magnetic fields with little electric power loss, but superconductivity is a "fragile" state and easily disrupted by fast field changes, temperature changes, welding errors, cosmic rays, and gremlins. A superconducting magnet can't push more flux than an iron/copper magnet through a saturated iron core. A hypothetical superconducting rotor cannot be cooled - black body radiation is proportional to T⁴, so cooling the rotor from 400K to 80K means it can dissipate 625x less power. Superconductors are complicated; I did my graduate school research on them, and they haven't gotten any simpler. Suggest superconductors to me as a solution for anything (besides measuring quantum interference) and I will assume you are inexperienced and not helpful. Make a commercially successful product with superconductors, and I'll be glad to learn from you.

Costs: the $2B estimate is old, and mostly a "sum of ignorance"; it doesn't include mistakes, pensions, and toilet paper for the bathrooms. The main cost is the power plants that drive the loop, and I've never built a floating gigawatt power plant so I have no idea what one will cost 20 years from now.

Land anchor: Nope. Where there is land, there are shrapnel-sensitive citizens, missile-toting bandits, and interfering governments. We will work with all governments, making favorites means making enemies.


Prerequisites: