Catch Wires
Note: the idea below may be obsolete.
An easier way is to launch flexible, compliant carbon fiber cloth panels from the construction station at the front of the vehicle, and reduce the vehicle's relative velocity with frequent soft impacts.
The launch loop will provide cheap, high speed vehicle launch into high apogee orbits, such as synchronous Construction Orbits. The vehicle can be passive, simple, and cheap, launched at a large orbiting station providing the delta V for orbit modification. Raising the vehicle's perigee above LEO will require some apogee delta V, ranging from 25 to 120 m/s.
These low delta V's can be provided with a cable arrest system on an orbiting station, resembling the tailhook capture system on an aircraft carrier. The same system can be used to launch a vehicle retrograde, slowing it down at apogee to reenter at perigee. However, this adds or subtracts momentum from the station, which must add (or subtract) thrust to maintain orbital position. This delta V can be provided with a very low specific impulse (ISP) rocket mounted on the orbiting station itself.
A low ISP is desirable for three reasons - it reduces temperatures, it permits a very cheap propellant, and it drops the enture exhaust plume into Earth's atmosphere, leaving no orbiting "molecular space debris" to impact other spacecraft. The propellant may be plain water electrically heated into steam, or mixed with hydrogen peroxide (ISP 265 seconds). Given the limit on exhaust velocity, ISP will range from 145 seconds (one day construction orbit) down to 30 seconds (ten day construction orbit).
With launch costs below $1/kg, propellant expense is more important than performance, and a few percent smaller delivered mass fraction is acceptable.
The energy for electrical heating can be generated by adding radial velocity to the incoming vehicle (launching slightly faster and earlier). The catch wires slowing the vehicle relative to the station can be spooled around drums driving electrical generators, providing power to the propellant heaters.
Presume very very good measurement of positions and velocities in cislunar space, to micrometers and nanometers per second. We can measure the orbits of the LAGEOS Laser Geodetic Satellites to micrometer accuracy through a turbulent atmosphere now, and the LIGO beam arms to 1e-20 meter accuracy today. With the atmosphere out of the way, and using electronic control rather than turbulent propellant construction, very high accuracy can be developed over time.
Some nice drawings here, Real Soon Now.
398600 |
km3/s2 Earth standard gravitational parameter |
|||
86164 |
sec Earth sidereal day |
|||
8378 |
km construction orbit perigee |
|||
6458 |
km Earth launch loop radius, launch orbit perigee |
|||
0.5 |
Energy efficiency scaling |
|||
0.5 |
propellant plume velocity scaling |
|||
30 |
km perigee drop for abort reentry |
|||
Construction Orbit Destination |
||||
1 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
sidereal days period |
86164 |
172328 |
430820 |
861641 |
sec period |
42164 |
66931 |
123289 |
195709 |
km semimajor axis |
75950 |
125485 |
238200 |
383039 |
km construction orbit apogee |
3075 |
2440 |
1798 |
1427 |
m/s characteristic velocity |
9257 |
9445 |
9588 |
9645 |
m/s perigee |
1021 |
631 |
337 |
211 |
m/s apogee |
9.065 |
14.978 |
28.432 |
45.720 |
final apo/peri ratio |
511 |
315 |
169 |
106 |
m/s retrograde propellant plume velocity |
112.9 |
117.1 |
120.1 |
121.4 |
MJ/kg 2*(gravitational energy change) |
908 |
558 |
297 |
186 |
m/s Launch arrival tangential velocity |
1419 |
873 |
466 |
291 |
m/s total plume velocity |
145 |
89 |
48 |
30 |
seconds, ISP |
113 |
73 |
40 |
25 |
m/s tangential delta V |
0.0796 |
0.0832 |
0.0858 |
0.0868 |
velocity ratio / plume mass fraction |
0.321 |
0.127 |
0.037 |
0.015 |
(km/s)² radial arrival velocity squared |
566 |
356 |
193 |
121 |
m/s radial arrival velocity |
0.825 |
0.311 |
0.088 |
0.035 |
(km/s)² tangential arrival velocity squared |
114.09 |
117.53 |
120.22 |
121.41 |
(km/s)² launch perigee velocity squared |
10681 |
10841 |
10965 |
11019 |
m/s launch perigee velocity |
908 |
558 |
297 |
186 |
m/s scaled to arrival by ang. momentum |
42627 |
67390 |
123743 |
196161 |
km launch orbit semimajor axis |
1.88 |
1.21 |
0.66 |
0.42 |
m/s abort to -30km delta perigee |
Incoming vehicles will be dumb and passive - they will have a small emergency rocket engine providing less than 2 m/s of delta V near apogee, dropping perigee from 80 km launch loop altitude to 50 km reentry altitude. Manned vehicles (and expensive cargo) will require heat shields and parachutes resembling the Apollo capsule; expendable cargo will be allowed to crumple and plunge into disposal areas over the ocean. My guess is that a destructive reentry won't "burn up", but will break up.
An alternative thrust system might be simple panels of laser-ablative rubber, with laser stations in orbit capable of pulse heating the surface of the material and throwing off a few grams of mass, creating a few newton-seconds of momentum. However, this is likely to leave plume debris in orbit.
However, for 99%+ of all vehicles, missions should be designed to operate passively, with almost no expended reaction mass. A spacefaring civilization will have billions of tonnes in Earth orbit, and zero tolerance for uncontrolled material and rocket plumes in those orbits.