Differences between revisions 2 and 9 (spanning 7 versions)
Revision 2 as of 2019-06-13 23:05:27
Size: 594
Comment:
Revision 9 as of 2019-06-17 02:16:22
Size: 788
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
Contemplating the expansion ratio and mach number of miscellaneous high-expansion rocket engines. The mach number is from Figure 3.1 on page 39, assuming a specific heat ratio of 1.3: Contemplating the expansion ratio and mach number of miscellaneous high-expansion rocket engines. The mach number is from Figure 3.1 on page 39 of Sutton, assuming a specific heat ratio of 1.3:
Line 11: Line 11:
|| SpaceX Merlin Vacuum 1D || 165.1 || 6.36 || || SpaceX Merlin Vacuum 1D || 165   || 6.36 ||
||<-3>||
||<-3>||
Line 13: Line 15:
||<-3> from Phipps and Michaelis 1994; can we do better? ||

note = Atlas sustainer was central engine used after the two outer booster engines were jettisoned.

Rocket Engines

Contemplating the expansion ratio and mach number of miscellaneous high-expansion rocket engines. The mach number is from Figure 3.1 on page 39 of Sutton, assuming a specific heat ratio of 1.3:

ratio

mach

Saturn V first stage F1

16.1

4.01

Saturn V 2nd/3rd J2

27.5

4.50

Apollo SM AJ10-137

62.5

5.31

Shuttle SSME RS-25

77.5

5.53

SpaceX Merlin Vacuum 1C

14.5

3.91

SpaceX Merlin Vacuum 1D

165

6.36

Laser Ablation Thrust

2.95

2.50

from Phipps and Michaelis 1994; can we do better?

note = Atlas sustainer was central engine used after the two outer booster engines were jettisoned.

RocketEngines (last edited 2019-06-17 02:16:22 by KeithLofstrom)