|
Size: 2644
Comment:
|
← Revision 12 as of 2017-02-25 19:34:07 ⇥
Size: 1992
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 4: | Line 4: |
| http://e-magnetsuk.com/neodymium_magnets/neodymium_grades.aspx | .http://e-magnetsuk.com/neodymium_magnets/neodymium_grades.aspx .https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare-earth_magnet .https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neodymium_magnet .[[ http://www.efunda.com/glossary/units/units--energy_density--megagauss-oersted_mgoe.cfm | 1 MGOe = 7958 J/m3]] |
| Line 6: | Line 9: |
| An N52 magnet has a maximum energy product of 50 mega-gauss Oersteds, which is 50*7958kJ/m3 or 398 MJ/m³ . the density is 7.5, so that works out to 53 kJ/kg. |
An N52 magnet has a maximum energy product of 50 mega-gauss Oersteds, which is 50*7958 J/m3 or 398 KJ/m³ . NIB density is 7.5, or 7500 kg/m³ so that works out to 53 J/kg. |
| Line 9: | Line 11: |
| A high strength NIB magnet should be kept below 80C; launch loop magnet sleds should be refrigerated, perhaps to liquid nitrogen temperatures, before use, as they will be heated by hypersonic passage through the thin upper atmosphere. Some grades (N38 EH) can tolerate 200C, but are 36 mega-gauss Oersteds, 38 kJ/kg. | A high strength NIB magnet should be kept below 80C; launch loop magnet sleds should be refrigerated before use, perhaps to liquid nitrogen temperatures, as they will be heated by hypersonic passage through the thin upper atmosphere. Some grades of NIB (N38 EH) can tolerate 200C, but are 36 mega-gauss Oersteds, 38 J/kg. |
| Line 11: | Line 13: |
| A reusable launch sled containing one tonne of NIB might be 10 square meters and 1.3 cm thick, 38 MJ. Derate by a factor of 4, and assume 20% flux efficiency in a gap 4 centimeters across. That is 2 cubic meters of effective flux area filled with 4.75 MJ of energy per cubic meter. B² = 2 μ₀ × 4.75e6 = π × 8e-7 × 4.75e6, B = 3.4 Tesla??? No, I'm doing something wrong. Assume 0.5 Tesla in the gap. | A reusable launch sled containing one tonne of N38 EH NIB might be 10 square meters and 1.3 cm thick, 38 KJ. |
| Line 13: | Line 15: |
| If the one tonne sled is pushing itself and 5 tonnes of payload with an acceleration of 30 m/s², the total thrust on the sled is 150 KN, or 15 KN/m². | If the one tonne sled is pushing itself and 5 tonnes of payload with an acceleration of 30 m/s², the total thrust on the sled is 150 KN, or 15 KN/m². |
| Line 15: | Line 17: |
| === Linear Motor Guesstimates === (probably BS for now) |
Custom [[ http://www.arnoldmagnetics.com/en-us/Products/Shaped-Field-Magnets | Shaped Field Magnets ]] can be made to concentrate flux on the motor side. |
| Line 18: | Line 19: |
| The sled is the "rotor", and the field windings of the launch track are the "stator". Assume 1 kg/m^2 of primary aluminum in the track, which is an average thickness of 3.7e-4 m, 80 μΩ/□. This will be in multiple windings with gaps, so lets increase that by a factor of 12.5 to 1 mΩ/□ . | A permanent magnet can be modelled as a ribbon of current around the edges. It can also be modelled as an array of dipole magnets. |
| Line 20: | Line 21: |
| Misusing the analysis on page 57 of ''Linear Electric Motors" by Nasar and Boldea (1987), let's fake some numbers: | == FEMM Finite Element Magnet Modelling == |
| Line 22: | Line 23: |
| $ < F > ~ = ~ { \Large { { \sigma B^2 s V \lambda l } \over { 4 | \Delta |^2 Re( \alpha ) } } ~ N } $ Newtons | http://www.femm.info/wiki/Documentation/ |
| Line 24: | Line 25: |
| . $ N $ = number of windings . $ \lambda $ = "twice the pole pitch" = winding repeat distance in meters . $ l $ = pole width The area of the poles is $ Area = N \times \lambda \times l $, so this simplifies to: $ < F > ~ = ~ { \Large { { \sigma B^2 s U Area } \over { 4 | \Delta |^2 Re( \alpha ) } } } $ Newtons . $ < F > $ = thrust = 1.5e5 Newtons . $ \sigma $ = 1000 mhos . $ s $ = slip (which we will compute) . $ B $ = 0.5 Tesla . $ U $ = synchronous speed, assume small slip and vehicle speed What is $ \Delta $ and $ \alpha $? . $ g $ = gap in meters . $ \omega $ = frequency Oops, rethinking those equations, they assume a solid conductor, not high frequency Litz style windings. I'll need to rework this. My guess is that the slip is very small and the efficiency very high. |
[[ attachment:FEMMmanual42.pdf | pdf ]] |
| Line 47: | Line 29: |
| ---- | |
| Line 48: | Line 31: |
| == NiB alternatives == | |
| Line 49: | Line 33: |
| University of Minnesota claims anisotropic Iron Nitride magnets Fe,,16,,N,,2,, can theoretically produce 134 MGOe, have made 10 MGOe so far. | |
| Line 50: | Line 35: |
| . http://license.umn.edu/technologies/20120016_iron-nitride-permanent-magnet-alternative-to-rare-earth-and-neodymium-magnets . http://www.designworldonline.com/coming-revolution-high-strength-magnets/ . http://people.ece.umn.edu/~jpwang/ |
Neodymium Iron Boron Magnets for Launch Sleds
An N52 magnet has a maximum energy product of 50 mega-gauss Oersteds, which is 50*7958 J/m3 or 398 KJ/m³ . NIB density is 7.5, or 7500 kg/m³ so that works out to 53 J/kg.
A high strength NIB magnet should be kept below 80C; launch loop magnet sleds should be refrigerated before use, perhaps to liquid nitrogen temperatures, as they will be heated by hypersonic passage through the thin upper atmosphere. Some grades of NIB (N38 EH) can tolerate 200C, but are 36 mega-gauss Oersteds, 38 J/kg.
A reusable launch sled containing one tonne of N38 EH NIB might be 10 square meters and 1.3 cm thick, 38 KJ.
If the one tonne sled is pushing itself and 5 tonnes of payload with an acceleration of 30 m/s², the total thrust on the sled is 150 KN, or 15 KN/m².
Custom Shaped Field Magnets can be made to concentrate flux on the motor side.
A permanent magnet can be modelled as a ribbon of current around the edges. It can also be modelled as an array of dipole magnets.
FEMM Finite Element Magnet Modelling
http://www.femm.info/wiki/Documentation/
NiB alternatives
University of Minnesota claims anisotropic Iron Nitride magnets Fe16N2 can theoretically produce 134 MGOe, have made 10 MGOe so far.