| Size: 2693 Comment:  | Size: 4554 Comment:  | 
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. | 
| Line 1: | Line 1: | 
| #format jsmath | |
| Line 7: | Line 8: | 
| So to increase force in a cable, the cable must be spooled, and energy applied to spool it.  This energy is stored in the elastic strain of the cable material.  A thinner cable stretches more per unit of force, and moves faster, so more energy must be expended to spool it. Assume a cable with a linear mass density of $ \rho_L $ and a static tension $ F_T $, with a spool at $ l = 0 $ and an infinitely strong attachment at $ l = L $. For a step increase in force of $ \Delta F $ away from the attachment, the strain wave propagates down the cable towards the attachment at the speed of sound $ V_C $, reflecting off it and propagating back, returning to the spool in time $ T_{RT} = L / 2 V_C $. The cable in front of the strain wave moves away from the attachment at velocity $ V_S $, and the force accelerates a new segment of length $ d l $ in time $ d t $. The segment length $ d l = V_C d t $, the segment mass $ d m = \rho_L d l = \rho_L V_C d t $ and the force is $ \Delta F = \rho_L V_C V_S $. Assuming $ \Delta F \ll F_T $, the power expended spooling the cable is $ P = F_T V_S = \Delta F F_T / \rho_L V_C $. The total energy is $ E = 2 \Delta F F_T L/ \rho_L {V_C}^2 $. Assume the cable is stressed at $ K S $, where $ S $ is the breaking strength and $ K $ is the safety factor. If the cross section area of the cable is $ A $, then $ F_T = A K S $ . If the volume mass density of the cable material is $ \rho $, then $ \rho_L = A \rho $. The propagation velocity is derived from $ V_C = \sqrt { Y / \rho } $ where $ Y $ is Young's modulus (often called E, but we don't want to confuse it with the energy) . The total energy becomes $ E = 2 \Delta F A K S L/ A \rho ( Y / \rho ) = 2 \Delta F K S L / Y $. Note that a material with a higher breaking strain ( higher $ S / Y $ ) will store more energy. | |
| Line 22: | Line 28: | 
| note: Nanotube properties are controversial. The CTE simulation [[ etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-08262005-003434/.../Thesis.pdf | Prakash ]] is used here, but other simulations differ wildly. | note: Nanotube properties are controversial. The CTE simulation by [[ http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-08262005-003434/.../Thesis.pdf | Prakash ]] is used here, but other simulations differ wildly. | 
Linear Cables
Stabilization and elevator cables on the launch loop are very long, and propagation delay is a big issue. In most systems people are familiar with, cables are short enough and forces change slowly enough that propagation delay is not a major issue. With a launch loop, forces can change rapidly (milliseconds) while the propagation delays are 10s of seconds.
For example, when an instantaneous force change is applied to one end of a very long cable, the end does not stretch a little, it moves, and keeps moving until the force has had time to propagate to a stationary attachment and back. For a 100km Kevlar 49 stabilization cable, that can be 22 seconds, in which time many meters of cable moves.
So to increase force in a cable, the cable must be spooled, and energy applied to spool it. This energy is stored in the elastic strain of the cable material. A thinner cable stretches more per unit of force, and moves faster, so more energy must be expended to spool it.
Assume a cable with a linear mass density of \rho_L and a static tension F_T , with a spool at l = 0 and an infinitely strong attachment at l = L . For a step increase in force of \Delta F away from the attachment, the strain wave propagates down the cable towards the attachment at the speed of sound V_C , reflecting off it and propagating back, returning to the spool in time T_{RT} = L / 2 V_C . The cable in front of the strain wave moves away from the attachment at velocity V_S , and the force accelerates a new segment of length d l in time d t . The segment length d l = V_C d t , the segment mass d m = \rho_L d l = \rho_L V_C d t and the force is \Delta F = \rho_L V_C V_S . Assuming \Delta F \ll F_T , the power expended spooling the cable is P = F_T V_S = \Delta F F_T / \rho_L V_C . The total energy is E = 2 \Delta F F_T L/ \rho_L {V_C}^2 .
Assume the cable is stressed at K S , where S is the breaking strength and K is the safety factor. If the cross section area of the cable is A , then F_T = A K S . If the volume mass density of the cable material is \rho , then \rho_L = A \rho . The propagation velocity is derived from V_C = \sqrt { Y / \rho } where Y is Young's modulus (often called E, but we don't want to confuse it with the energy) . The total energy becomes E = 2 \Delta F A K S L/ A \rho ( Y / \rho ) = 2 \Delta F K S L / Y . Note that a material with a higher breaking strain ( higher S / Y ) will store more energy.
| Material | density | elastic | strength | CTE | Vsound | Support | 100km | Therm exp | notes | 
| 
 | 
 | modulus | 
 | 
 | 
 | Length | Round Trip | 100Km*100K | 
 | 
| 
 | gm/cm3 | GPa | GPa | um/m-K | km/s | km | seconds | m | 
 | 
| 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| Steel SAE980x | 7.9 | 200 | 0.65 | 12 | 5.0 | 8.4 | 40 | 120 | 
 | 
| Pure Kevlar | 1.44 | 124 | 3.62 | -2.7 | 9.3 | 250 | 22 | -27 | 
 | 
| Pure Spectra | 0.97 | 168 | 2.58 | -12 | 13.2 | 270 | 15 | -120 | continuous creep | 
| Pure Diamond | 3.52 | 1140 | >60 | 1.2 | 18.0 | 1700 | 11 | 12 | 
 | 
| Pure nanotube | ~1.4 | ~1000 | ~60 | -9? | 26.0 | 4400 | 8 | -90 | 
 | 
| composites: | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| 80% Kevlar | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| 80% Spectra | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| 80% nanotube | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
note: Nanotube properties are controversial. The CTE simulation by Prakash is used here, but other simulations differ wildly.
