Differences between revisions 4 and 5
Revision 4 as of 2019-03-16 18:51:11
Size: 2013
Comment:
Revision 5 as of 2019-03-16 18:52:03
Size: 1995
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 8: Line 8:
So, given the construction orbit, choose an angle from apogee $$ \theta $$. Construction orbits have low perigees and very high apogees, far beyond GEO, so the apogee velocity is small and the angular velocity very small near apogee. Given a desired arrival time $$ t_{ac} $$ referenced from $$ t_{ac} = 0 $$ at apogee, we can estimate $$ \theta $$ given the apogee radius $$ r_{ac} $$ and apogee velocity $$ v_{ac} $$ So, given the construction orbit, choose an angle from apogee $ \theta $. Construction orbits have low perigees and very high apogees, far beyond GEO, so the apogee velocity is small and the angular velocity very small near apogee. Given a desired arrival time $ t_{ac} $ referenced from $ t_{ac} = 0 $ at apogee, we can estimate $ \theta $ given the apogee radius $ r_{ac} $ and apogee velocity $ v_{ac} $
Line 10: Line 10:
The construction orbit perigee should be well above LEO; assume an altitude of 2000 km above the equatorial radius 6378 km, thus $$ r_{pc} $$ = 8378 km. The construction orbit semimajor axis is defined from the orbit period, which should be a multiple $$ N $$ of an 86164.0905 second sidereal day. From that, we can compute the apogee radius, velocity, and angular velocity $$ \omega_{ac} $$, then iterate from the desired arrival time to the exact capture angle. The construction orbit perigee should be well above LEO; assume an altitude of 2000 km above the equatorial radius 6378 km, thus $ r_{pc} $ = 8378 km. The construction orbit semimajor axis is defined from the orbit period, which should be a multiple $ N $ of an 86164.0905 second sidereal day. From that, we can compute the apogee radius, velocity, and angular velocity $ \omega_{ac} $, then iterate from the desired arrival time to the exact capture angle.

Construction2

The older rendezvous page, Construction1, started from a launch time and an exact associated longitude; calculations were complicated and the radial velocity at capture was large.

A better approach is to start with the capture angle at the construction orbit, which defines an exact radius and radial velocity. From there, find a launch orbit with an apogee, launch angle, and launch time that arrives at the construction orbit with the same radius and arrival velocity. The tangential velocity will be different, on the order of 100 m/s, but we can accommodate that with a "passive net capture system".

So, given the construction orbit, choose an angle from apogee \theta . Construction orbits have low perigees and very high apogees, far beyond GEO, so the apogee velocity is small and the angular velocity very small near apogee. Given a desired arrival time t_{ac} referenced from t_{ac} = 0 at apogee, we can estimate \theta given the apogee radius r_{ac} and apogee velocity v_{ac}

The construction orbit perigee should be well above LEO; assume an altitude of 2000 km above the equatorial radius 6378 km, thus r_{pc} = 8378 km. The construction orbit semimajor axis is defined from the orbit period, which should be a multiple N of an 86164.0905 second sidereal day. From that, we can compute the apogee radius, velocity, and angular velocity \omega_{ac} , then iterate from the desired arrival time to the exact capture angle.

period

semimajor

apogee

apogee V

ang.freq.

1 hr angle

N

P_c

a_c

r_{ac}

v_{ac}

\omega_{ac}

radians

sdays

seconds

km

km

km/s

radians/sec

est.

exact

1

86164.1

2

86164.1

3

86164.1

4

86164.1

5

86164.1

6

86164.1

7

86164.1

Construction2 (last edited 2019-04-26 19:11:45 by KeithLofstrom)