CNTE
Pure carbon nanotubes exhibit superlubricity - approximately ZERO friction between neighboring tubes in a bundle. In 2013, Zhang et. al. published a paper on carbon nanotube superlubricity that measured the intershell sliding force of a 1 centimeter double-wall carbon nanotube (DWCNT). Three diameters were measured, and the tiny pullout force matched theory, pa function of outer tube diameter.
| Zhang et. al. | 
 | Laurent et. al | |||||
| Diameter | Pullout | 
 | Inner | Density | Tubes | Pullout | Strength | 
| nm | Force nN | 
 | nm | Kg/m³ | / m² | Pressure | Kyuri | 
| 2.73 | 1.37 | 
 | 2.39 | 1951 | 1.16e17 | 159 MPa | 81.5 | 
| 2.93 | 1.47 | 
 | 2.59 | 1835 | 1.01e17 | 148 MPa | 80.7 | 
| 3.26 | 1.64 | 
 | 2.92 | 1672 | 8.10e16 | 134 MPa | 80.1 | 
Laurent et. al. estimates that the inner tube diameter is 0.34 nM ( d_{s-s} ) less than the outer tube diameter, and that DWCNT density (g/cm³) is:
d_{MW} = 6084 { \Large { ( d_{out} ~ - ~ d_{s-s} ) \over { d_{out}^2 } } } with d_{out} and d_{s-s} in nanometers.
I added my own estimations for perfect hexagonally close packed tube density, Tubes/m² = \sqrt( 3 ) / 2 D^2 = 0.866 / D^2 The pullout pressure P = 866 F / D^2 KPa if F is nanonewtons and D is nanometers. Results:
| Zhang et. al. | 
 | Laurent et. al | |||||
| Diameter | Pullout | 
 | Inner | Density | Tubes | Pullout | Strength | 
| nm | Force nN | 
 | nm | kg/m³ | / m² | Pressure | Kyuri | 
| 2.73 | 1.37 | 
 | 2.39 | 1951 | 1.16e17 | 159 MPa | 81.5 | 
| 2.93 | 1.47 | 
 | 2.59 | 1835 | 1.01e17 | 148 MPa | 80.7 | 
| 3.26 | 1.64 | 
 | 2.92 | 1672 | 8.10e16 | 134 MPa | 80.1 | 
These strengths for pure, perfect DWCNT are less than 0.2% of the minimum strength needed for a space elevator, and 2% of the strength of Torayca 1100G carbon fiber. Furthermore, given these pullout forces, which will be unevenly distributed in real atomically imperfect materials, the stretch will not recover; these are not spring forces, but disassembly forces. After the material slides apart, it will not go back together, the hysteresis is unity. This is weak taffy, not a strong elastic material like kevlar or carbon fiber, or even a .
The situation is grim but not completely hopeless. In CNT fibers - yarns between the extremes, Dr. Thurid Gspann et. al. suggests that defects create load-sharing crosslinks between tubes, but can reduce strength from the theoretical 100 GPa by 30% to 70%. Even with the theoretical "best defect" maximum of 70 GPa, and a density of 1700 kg/m, this theoretical atomic-precision macro-material will have a strength of 41 Myuri, less than the 48 Myuri (derated by 40% to 34 Myuri) material assumed by the 2013 Space Elevators assessment.
If ≈ 40 Myuri is potentially possible with perfect "precision-defect" CNT (based on current pessimistic knowledge), there may be an atomically-perfect 3D material structure with zero hysteresis and 40 Myuri strength. May be; in 2017, we do not have a scintilla of a clue how to do that. Indeed, these may be pseudo-life-like complex nanostructures that can repair and grow themselves under tension, but are far beyond our current understanding and technological imagination.
Space elevators have assumed diamond-like crystal tethers since the 1970s, and carbon nanotube tethers since the 1990s. The materials necessary have not yet been discovered, or even imagined in practical detail.
